From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815378F5D for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708452155; cv=none; b=GG0UxFlLM5vmvHcMHQIEInrUjTpr+t+Dypi5DKTNEVtMTgi6HdsBXO2K4frdf48P6+/zemgZmUFF8o/2RrZQYU0BR4W1PhhQFTsEo1AP7Hb68RAgE4ORSC/6lCuNN/hRGRisrB/U1I/GUA0ciHhnl1POSzt+weUcrmXIwgKTt28= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708452155; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nLGu6Nb4bFkyvkAMslpI2+BlJqsZtI8Bze9aXNjf0Jk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b8Wes5S0bB/J5Is16o3CEr3EJ9xYDHIfTe3uMmAc8pROyJdDKmPt35j7CEd7Ah3xicEsmTuN6X3MngsI9/elEd2a9g0c9nUcneCsFldp6rHyT/9ct++iRd5nV1ZKJ6vYFA2YPIt7QyyBKMub3JwwMgDm01TVQoXJaYjALTulCZg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=h94aH8C1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="h94aH8C1" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1708452152; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5YeqcILnxuh5l/4eD2MtYHXrzYLLCUoaxf6bJ3mGyrU=; b=h94aH8C1XgZFsWoFXf+fxZOCAb8pvjSsUge3iYHfICRBlYKtHJHKlyJGU8qer2TZAQYYSm 9LZvXZihoM7Dg43P67egtr+KQhHCSwYRLDiRM6RA56mV3JbanGvMzE60XfGeikpUFfwJuB ulOtk2Qj/g+ePhcMbYkNtbUbvPBamnM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-646-v2jcEkRlOfC-8UJMu6IJyQ-1; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:02:28 -0500 X-MC-Unique: v2jcEkRlOfC-8UJMu6IJyQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DBE1871A85; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTPC1VM0NT (dhcp-17-72.bos.redhat.com [10.18.17.72]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79953400D784; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:02:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Pravin B Shelar , dev@openvswitch.org, Ilya Maximets , Simon Horman , Eelco Chaudron , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] selftests: openvswitch: cleanups for running as selftests References: <20240216152846.1850120-1-aconole@redhat.com> <20240219122855.1f1ad0ac@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:02:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20240219122855.1f1ad0ac@kernel.org> (Jakub Kicinski's message of "Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:28:55 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.2 Jakub Kicinski writes: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:28:39 -0500 Aaron Conole wrote: >> The series is a host of cleanups to the openvswitch selftest suite >> which should be ready to run under the netdev selftest runners using >> vng. For now, the testing has been done with RW directories, but >> additional testing will be done to try and keep it all as RO to be >> more friendly. > > Would it be an option to make the output go into a dir in /tmp/ > instead of in place, in the tree? > > mktemp -p /tmp/ -d ovs-test.XXXXXXXXX That's probably the best approach. I'll switch to it. > or such?