From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
dev@openvswitch.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] openvswitch: return NF_ACCEPT when OVS_CT_NAT is net set in info nat
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:56:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7tk03u4o0s.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c17d8ea9547254180031510a3160fcd97ac945f.1668527318.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> (Xin Long's message of "Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:50:54 -0500")
Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> writes:
> Either OVS_CT_SRC_NAT or OVS_CT_DST_NAT is set, OVS_CT_NAT must be
> set in info->nat. Thus, if OVS_CT_NAT is not set in info->nat, it
> will definitely not do NAT but returns NF_ACCEPT in ovs_ct_nat().
>
> This patch changes nothing funcational but only makes this return
> earlier in ovs_ct_nat() to keep consistent with TC's processing
> in tcf_ct_act_nat().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-16 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-15 15:50 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: eliminate the duplicate code in the ct nat functions of ovs and tc Xin Long
2022-11-15 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] openvswitch: delete the unncessary skb_pull_rcsum call in ovs_ct_nat_execute Xin Long
2022-11-16 20:55 ` Aaron Conole
2022-11-15 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] openvswitch: return NF_ACCEPT when OVS_CT_NAT is net set in info nat Xin Long
2022-11-16 20:56 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2022-11-15 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: sched: return NF_ACCEPT when fails to add nat ext in tcf_ct_act_nat Xin Long
2022-11-15 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: sched: update the nat flag for icmp error packets in ct_nat_execute Xin Long
2022-11-15 15:50 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: move the nat function to nf_nat_core for ovs and tc Xin Long
2022-11-16 21:05 ` Aaron Conole
2022-11-17 0:36 ` Xin Long
2022-11-19 16:22 ` Aaron Conole
2022-11-16 21:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-11-17 0:51 ` Xin Long
2022-11-17 10:57 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-11-17 15:10 ` Xin Long
2022-11-15 19:42 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: eliminate the duplicate code in the ct nat functions of " Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7tk03u4o0s.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).