From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3021145B11 for ; Wed, 13 May 2026 15:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778684764; cv=none; b=h/9iw1iZFWe5xsXhqyFB4iOKYTCUkXrTOTtdMupclnC9Yq8VqpFJIePx0XRAC29XDN8wFmYVv94/IkYMoSAZ8yMsZZkVHbutpl+gUETCYdx6BAkESZX9fab86AUvmVJlut3F6Rz56lXTutmjeSLQjZqyhO0dlacW4WV43wl06UU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778684764; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iEjF+R8iN9xUeWEEDZCMd+xTX+D7ZErPg3FJEx0Nbp0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nk/tSStPNkDN0DionyF1uA0myNz4F2rAu++SY59jZGpudD+o2NCpU4JbBX1DpneL2Gp+Ea5BS0KA9wbQ5UlvXZm7j3qku2F1hxNdB5KkXZXASWNI6Escua5CHRvmSkWcN3iY9XK3g0vMPgNnOh78Bcc+RZY2T0vpD0WZEnAIzPo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Qj6ozmdT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Qj6ozmdT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1778684762; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iEjF+R8iN9xUeWEEDZCMd+xTX+D7ZErPg3FJEx0Nbp0=; b=Qj6ozmdTzVRiAzBRiElv21CutK0sjYcTc1Xg3JTlc7P9ua6KYyc+Hvj5ZowOWjTHc9sXxx 6G+M777BM2wD9tWZ7fE2ejWpcQFJxGeovy/yj/Xf9+ONLJTuoFnP/PPhiPn9Jdx2KNuNvv gkCr7Ni+9V89N1gi80TYuASZwnQ2EeQ= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-115-cxGh7gBGMVS0QXXJc8fzVw-1; Wed, 13 May 2026 11:06:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cxGh7gBGMVS0QXXJc8fzVw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: cxGh7gBGMVS0QXXJc8fzVw_1778684759 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804951800283; Wed, 13 May 2026 15:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTRH0061144 (unknown [10.22.90.43]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDDC51800465; Wed, 13 May 2026 15:05:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Minxi Hou Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, i.maximets@ovn.org, i.maximets@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] selftests: openvswitch: pylint cleanup for ovs-dpctl.py In-Reply-To: <20260513124704.2610072-1-houminxi@gmail.com> (Minxi Hou's message of "Wed, 13 May 2026 20:47:04 +0800") References: <20260513121240.2590767-1-houminxi@gmail.com> <20260513124704.2610072-1-houminxi@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 11:05:55 -0400 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 Minxi Hou writes: > Hi Aaron, Hi Minxi, > This series depends on the v10 vlan/pop_vlan series (still in New state): > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1093324 > > Patchwork flagged apply failure because v10 isn't in the tree yet. > > Should I wait for v10 to land and resend, or is there a way to > indicate the dependency so maintainers can apply them in order? We should wait until all dependent series are merged; there isn't a way to flog a series as depending on another as far as I'm aware. I'll take a look at this series but please wait until the v10 is merged. thanks! > Thanks, > Minxi