4.9-rc0: nf_hooks_ingress missing, breaking compilation

4.9-rc0: nf_hooks_ingress missing, breaking compilation

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 814 bytes --]

Hi!

In kernel based on edadd0e, I get plenty of errors such as:

net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
   rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
   ^
In file included from ./include/linux/linkage.h:4:0,
                 from ./include/linux/kernel.h:6,
                 from net/netfilter/core.c:10:
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
   rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
                              ^

Config is attached.

[Ok, I guess testing -rc0 is "a bit too brave" :-)]

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #1.2: delme.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 26370 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

Re: 4.9-rc0: nf_hooks_ingress missing, breaking compilation

[Aaron Conole]

Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:

> Hi!

Hi Pavel,

> In kernel based on edadd0e, I get plenty of errors such as:

In this case, I screwed up - sincere apologies.

Enabling CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS will work around this error for the
time being, while the fix makes it way through the various trees.

> net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
>    rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
>    ^
> In file included from ./include/linux/linkage.h:4:0,
>                  from ./include/linux/kernel.h:6,
>                  from net/netfilter/core.c:10:
> net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
>    rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
>                               ^
>
> Config is attached.
>
> [Ok, I guess testing -rc0 is "a bit too brave" :-)]
>
> Best regards,
> 									Pavel