netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: avoid race between device unregistration and set_channels
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 02:51:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f87576e0-93d2-42fe-a6da-09430386bc16@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250114112401.545a70f7@kernel.org>

On 14/01/2025 19:24, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 17:18:40 +0100 Antoine Tenart wrote:
>> This is because unregister_netdevice_many_notify might run before
>> set_channels (both are under rtnl). 
> 
> But that is very bad, not at all sane. The set call should not proceed
> once dismantle begins.
> 
> How about this?
> 
> diff --git a/net/ethtool/netlink.c b/net/ethtool/netlink.c index 849c98e637c6..913c8e329a06 100644
> --- a/net/ethtool/netlink.c
> +++ b/net/ethtool/netlink.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ int ethnl_ops_begin(struct net_device *dev)
>                 pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev.parent);
>  
>         if (!netif_device_present(dev) ||
> -           dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNREGISTERING) {
> +           dev->reg_state > NETREG_REGISTERED) {
>                 ret = -ENODEV;
>                 goto err;
>         }
> 

Would __dev_ethtool() need a similar check?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15  2:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-13 16:18 [PATCH net] net: avoid race between device unregistration and set_channels Antoine Tenart
2025-01-14 10:09 ` Edward Cree
2025-01-14 10:41   ` Antoine Tenart
2025-01-14 19:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  2:51   ` Edward Cree [this message]
2025-01-15  9:41     ` Antoine Tenart
2025-01-15 11:04       ` Edward Cree
2025-01-15 11:12         ` Antoine Tenart
2025-01-15  9:39   ` Antoine Tenart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f87576e0-93d2-42fe-a6da-09430386bc16@gmail.com \
    --to=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).