From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Roland Dreier" Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] infiniband: Add struct in6_addr addr to union ib_gib Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:15:47 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1225236128.5269.240.camel@localhost> <1225239374.5269.251.camel@localhost> <20081028.223941.18931166.davem@davemloft.net> <1225263521.5269.273.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, rdreier@cisco.com, general@lists.openfabrics.org, David Miller , harvey.harrison@gmail.com To: "Joe Perches" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1225263521.5269.273.camel@localhost> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > Sure. After Harvey's patches show up in > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git;a=summary > I'll make a patchset including this union ib_gid addition as > well as changes to drivers/infiniband/ OK I guess. I also don't have any objection to using a different format letter but the same underlying code as the p6 implementation as an alternative for handling the type checking. > Roland, in a separate question, are the infiniband maintainers > also the maintainers of include/rdma/? If "F: patterns" ever > gets accepted into MAINTAINERS, should include/rdma/ be listed > under infiniband? Yes, drivers/infiniband and include/rdma are all part of the InfiniBand/RDMA stack.