From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
To: "Jason Xing" <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, willemb@google.com,
kuniyu@google.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
jolsa@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
"Simon Sundberg" <Simon.Sundberg@kau.se>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] bpf: enable bpf timestamping rx in TCP layer
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 15:01:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9606d4b-7ff7-479f-8e73-2e8cc77095fa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518082344.96647-6-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
On 18/05/2026 10.23, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
>
> Add two if statements to accurately isolate bpf timestamping and so
> timestamping. They can work respectively.
>
> As to so_timestamping, only add a loose condition via report flags
> to avoid duplicate strict checks that is done in tcp_recv_timestamp()
> and performance impact. If the loose condition is hit,
> tcp_recv_timestamp() is able to handle the exact case and doesn't
> hamper the existing timestamping feature.
>
> Make it work in TCP protocol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 21ece4c71612..64c69bb3578a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -2949,8 +2949,18 @@ int tcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, int flags)
> release_sock(sk);
>
> if ((cmsg_flags | msg->msg_get_inq) && ret >= 0) {
> - if (cmsg_flags & TCP_CMSG_TS)
> - tcp_recv_timestamp(msg, sk, &tss);
> + if (cmsg_flags & TCP_CMSG_TS) {
> + u32 tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags);
> +
> + if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) &&
> + SK_BPF_CB_FLAG_TEST(sk, SK_BPF_CB_RX_TIMESTAMPING))
> + bpf_skops_rx_timestamping(sk, &tss,
> + BPF_SOCK_OPS_TSTAMP_RCV_CB);
Does this mean I can enable timestamp reading per cgroup?
In Simon's netstacklat[1] tool we are forced process all RX timestamp
(hooking fentry/tcp_recv_timestamp), and then we have a BPF filter[2] on
the cgroup IDs that we are interested in (which is a significant
overhead, as this is deployed at Cloudflare production scale).
[1] https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples/tree/main/netstacklat
[2]
https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples/blob/main/netstacklat/netstacklat.bpf.c#L484-L488
> + if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RCVTSTAMP) ||
> + tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE ||
> + tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE)
> + tcp_recv_timestamp(msg, sk, &tss);
> + }
> if ((cmsg_flags & TCP_CMSG_INQ) | msg->msg_get_inq) {
> msg->msg_inq = tcp_inq_hint(sk);
> if (cmsg_flags & TCP_CMSG_INQ)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 8:23 [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf-timetamp: support rx side Jason Xing
2026-05-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] bpf: Add bpf_ktime_get_real_ns() kfunc Jason Xing
2026-05-18 11:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-05-18 12:35 ` Jason Xing
2026-05-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] net: export sock_disable_timestamp() declaration Jason Xing
2026-05-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] bpf: support bpf_setsockopt for bpf timestamping rx feature Jason Xing
2026-05-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] bpf: add BPF_SOCK_OPS_TSTAMP_RCV_CB callback Jason Xing
2026-05-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] bpf: enable bpf timestamping rx in TCP layer Jason Xing
2026-05-18 13:01 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2026-05-18 13:53 ` Jason Xing
2026-05-18 16:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-05-18 23:16 ` Jason Xing
2026-05-18 23:24 ` Jason Xing
2026-05-19 9:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-05-18 15:34 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-18 23:56 ` Jason Xing
2026-05-18 8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add RX latency tests for bpf timestamping Jason Xing
2026-05-18 11:46 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] bpf-timetamp: support rx side Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-05-18 12:32 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9606d4b-7ff7-479f-8e73-2e8cc77095fa@kernel.org \
--to=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=Simon.Sundberg@kau.se \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox