From: Andrew Collins <acollins@cradlepoint.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: fq_codel and skb->hash
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:04:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9913fca-da16-8620-d237-d7d8d09cced2@cradlepoint.com> (raw)
The fq_codel packet scheduler always regenerates the skb flow hash. Is there any reason
to do this other than the recent hash perturbation additions?
I ask because I have a case where an incoming set of TCP flows is encapsulated in a
single ipsec tunnel, which is then classified on egress into a single flow by fq_codel
resulting in poor behavior.
Reusing the skb hash set in receive results in much better behavior, as the value is
determined pre-encapsulation and flows end up being distributed more naturally across
codel queues.
Is opportunistically using the pre-existing skb hash (if available) problematic? Is
there a better way to manage flow separation in routed+encapsulated traffic?
Thanks,
Andrew Collins
next reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-17 0:04 Andrew Collins [this message]
2017-01-17 1:44 ` fq_codel and skb->hash Eric Dumazet
2017-01-17 2:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-17 6:18 ` Tom Herbert
2017-01-17 15:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-18 20:21 ` Andrew Collins
2017-01-18 20:25 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9913fca-da16-8620-d237-d7d8d09cced2@cradlepoint.com \
--to=acollins@cradlepoint.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox