From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Cc: wd@denx.de, dzu@denx.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/3] fs_enet: Add FEC TX Alignment workaround for MPC5121
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:49:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa41001210849l1c9bdfbfla4dcb39d4b0d062b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1264039999-25731-4-git-send-email-agust@denx.de>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de> wrote:
> The FEC on 5121 has problems with misaligned tx buffers.
> The RM says any alignment is ok but empirical results
> show that packet buffers ending in 0x1E will sometimes
> hang the FEC. Other bad alignment does not hang but will
> cause silent TX failures resulting in about a 1% packet
> loss as tested by ping -f from a remote host.
>
> This patch is a work around that copies every tx packet
> to an aligned skb before sending.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Rigby <jcrigby@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
> Cc: <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> ---
> Changes since previous submited version:
>
> - don't use printk any more and use dev_warn().
>
> drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c b/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
> index 6bce5c8..7f0bd5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
> @@ -580,6 +580,32 @@ void fs_cleanup_bds(struct net_device *dev)
>
> /**********************************************************************************/
>
> +static struct sk_buff *tx_skb_align_workaround(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *new_skb;
> + struct fs_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> + /* Alloc new skb */
> + new_skb = dev_alloc_skb(ENET_RX_FRSIZE + 32);
> + if (!new_skb) {
> + dev_warn(fep->dev, "Memory squeeze, dropping tx packet.\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Make sure new skb is properly aligned */
> + skb_align(new_skb, 32);
> +
> + /* Copy data to new skb ... */
> + skb_copy_from_linear_data(skb, new_skb->data, skb->len);
> + skb_put(new_skb, skb->len);
> +
> + /* ... and free an old one */
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> +
> + return new_skb;
> +}
This looks expensive. It's allocating a new skb on *every* packet
transmission, rather than just on the ones that fail the alignment
condition.
> +
> static int fs_enet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct fs_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(dev);
> @@ -588,6 +614,18 @@ static int fs_enet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> u16 sc;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + if (fep->fec.fec_id == FS_ENET_MPC5121_FEC) {
> + skb = tx_skb_align_workaround(dev, skb);
> + if (!skb) {
> + /*
> + * We have lost packet due to memory allocation error
> + * in tx_skb_align_workaround(). Hopefully original skb
> + * is still valid, so try transmit it later.
> + */
> + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> + }
> + }
> +
Rather than performing this test every time through on a fast path,
consider creating a new start_xmit hook and registering the correct
one in the ops structure at probe time.
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->tx_lock, flags);
>
> /*
> --
> 1.5.6.3
>
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 2:13 [net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/3] Support for MPC512x FEC Anatolij Gustschin
2010-01-21 2:13 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/3] fs_enet: use dev_xxx instead of printk Anatolij Gustschin
2010-01-21 16:43 ` Grant Likely
2010-01-21 2:13 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] fs_enet: Add support for MPC512x to fs_enet driver Anatolij Gustschin
2010-01-21 9:22 ` David Miller
2010-01-21 9:33 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2010-01-21 15:25 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-22 2:03 ` David Miller
2010-01-22 9:35 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-02-09 14:23 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2010-02-09 20:13 ` David Miller
2010-02-10 9:15 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-02-10 10:20 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-02-10 14:28 ` Grant Likely
2010-01-23 9:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-01-24 14:40 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-24 16:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-01-27 2:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-01-27 8:13 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-21 20:15 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-21 2:13 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/3] fs_enet: Add FEC TX Alignment workaround for MPC5121 Anatolij Gustschin
2010-01-21 16:49 ` Grant Likely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa686aa41001210849l1c9bdfbfla4dcb39d4b0d062b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=agust@denx.de \
--cc=dzu@denx.de \
--cc=kosmo@semihalf.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).