From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/6] xfrm: Convert __xfrm_dst_lookup() to dscp_t.
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:11:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fad338689ca44790f613e05cc6064248ef064d5c.1728982714.git.gnault@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1728982714.git.gnault@redhat.com>
Pass a dscp_t variable to __xfrm_dst_lookup(), instead of an int, to
prevent accidental setting of ECN bits in ->flowi4_tos.
Callers of ip_mc_validate_source() to consider are:
* xfrm_dst_lookup() which already has a dscp_t variable to pass as
parameter. We just need to remove the inet_dscp_to_dsfield()
conversion.
* xfrm_dev_state_add() in net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c. This function
sets the tos parameter to 0, which is already a valid dscp_t value,
so it doesn't need to be adjusted for the new prototype.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
---
include/net/xfrm.h | 3 ++-
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index b6bfdc6416c7..18c0a6077ae9 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <net/dst.h>
+#include <net/inet_dscp.h>
#include <net/ip.h>
#include <net/route.h>
#include <net/ipv6.h>
@@ -1764,7 +1765,7 @@ static inline int xfrm_user_policy(struct sock *sk, int optname,
}
#endif
-struct dst_entry *__xfrm_dst_lookup(struct net *net, int tos, int oif,
+struct dst_entry *__xfrm_dst_lookup(struct net *net, dscp_t dscp, int oif,
const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
int family, u32 mark);
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 6e30b110accf..a1b499cc840c 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static const struct xfrm_if_cb *xfrm_if_get_cb(void)
return rcu_dereference(xfrm_if_cb);
}
-struct dst_entry *__xfrm_dst_lookup(struct net *net, int tos, int oif,
+struct dst_entry *__xfrm_dst_lookup(struct net *net, dscp_t dscp, int oif,
const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
int family, u32 mark)
@@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ struct dst_entry *__xfrm_dst_lookup(struct net *net, int tos, int oif,
if (unlikely(afinfo == NULL))
return ERR_PTR(-EAFNOSUPPORT);
- dst = afinfo->dst_lookup(net, tos, oif, saddr, daddr, mark);
+ dst = afinfo->dst_lookup(net, inet_dscp_to_dsfield(dscp), oif, saddr,
+ daddr, mark);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -310,8 +311,7 @@ static inline struct dst_entry *xfrm_dst_lookup(struct xfrm_state *x,
daddr = x->coaddr;
}
- dst = __xfrm_dst_lookup(net, inet_dscp_to_dsfield(dscp), oif, saddr,
- daddr, family, mark);
+ dst = __xfrm_dst_lookup(net, dscp, oif, saddr, daddr, family, mark);
if (!IS_ERR(dst)) {
if (prev_saddr != saddr)
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-15 9:11 [PATCH net-next 0/6] xfrm: Convert __xfrm4_dst_lookup() and its callers to dscp_t Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] xfrm: Convert xfrm_get_tos() " Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] xfrm: Convert xfrm_bundle_create() " Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] xfrm: Convert xfrm_dst_lookup() " Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 11:48 ` Eyal Birger
2024-10-16 8:23 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] xfrm: Convert the ->dst_lookup() callback " Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] xfrm: Convert __xfrm4_dst_lookup() " Guillaume Nault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fad338689ca44790f613e05cc6064248ef064d5c.1728982714.git.gnault@redhat.com \
--to=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).