Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	moshe@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] ionic: add devlink firmware update
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 14:35:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb821a31-e4d5-346b-4f5c-6c545661c638@pensando.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200903173029.GD2997@nanopsycho.orion>

On 9/3/20 10:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:58:42PM CEST, snelson@pensando.io wrote:
>>
>> True, they aren't "needed" for operational purposes, but they are rather
>> useful when inspecting a system after getting a report of bad behavior, and
> I don't think it is nice to pollute dmesg with any arbitrary driver-specific
> messages.
>
>
>> since this should be seldom performed there should be no risk of filling the
>> log.  As far as I can tell, the devlink messages are only seen at the time
>> the flash is performed as output from the flash command, or from a devlink
>> monitor if someone started it before the flash operation.  Is there any other
>> place that can be inspected later that will indicate someone was fussing with
>> the firmware?
> Not really, no. But perhaps we can have a counter for that. Similar to
> what Jakub suggested for reload.
>

When we need to debug a complaint about a firmware load, I want to be 
able to find out what fw file the user actually tried to load, and maybe 
were there other broken load attempts before that.  If there was 
something that broke in the download, it would be nice to know when - 
beginning?  4k bytes in?  near the end?  A counter might show a number 
of load attempts, but no context as to when, what file, or what else was 
going on around the same time.

sln


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-03 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-02 19:57 [PATCH net-next 0/2] ionic: add devlink dev flash support Shannon Nelson
2020-09-02 19:57 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] ionic: update the fw update api Shannon Nelson
2020-09-02 19:57 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] ionic: add devlink firmware update Shannon Nelson
2020-09-03  6:01   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-03 15:58     ` Shannon Nelson
2020-09-03 17:30       ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-03 21:35         ` Shannon Nelson [this message]
2020-09-03 19:53   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-03 21:37     ` Shannon Nelson
2020-09-03 21:45       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-03 21:47         ` Shannon Nelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb821a31-e4d5-346b-4f5c-6c545661c638@pensando.io \
    --to=snelson@pensando.io \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=moshe@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox