Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] net: stmmac: L3/L4 filter bug fixes

[Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>]

Hi Nazim,

On 6/16/26 06:26, muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com wrote:
> From: Nazim Amirul <muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com>
> 
> This series fixes three bugs in the stmmac L3/L4 TC flower filter
> implementation for the XGMAC2 core. All three patches target net.
> 
> The L3/L4 filter match count statistics patch (originally patch 4/4)
> has been split out and will be sent separately against net-next per
> Andrew Lunn's review of v1.
> 
> Patch 1 fixes a register corruption bug in the L4 filter port configuration.
> The XGMAC_L4_ADDR register holds both source and destination port match
> values in a single register. The original code overwrites the entire register
> when setting either field, silently erasing the other. This is fixed by
> using a read-modify-write sequence.
> 
> Patch 2 fixes the basic flow match parser to properly reject unsupported
> offload requests with -EOPNOTSUPP instead of silently accepting them.
> Unsupported cases include partial protocol masks, non-IPv4 network proto,
> and non-TCP/UDP transport proto. Extack messages are now included so users
> know exactly which part of the match is unsupported. The -EOPNOTSUPP is
> also now returned directly instead of using break, which was silently
> discarding the error on FLOW_CLS_REPLACE operations.
> 
> Patch 3 fixes a stale action bug on filter deletion. When a filter entry
> with a drop action is deleted, the action field was not reset, causing
> it to persist and potentially affect subsequent filter configurations.
> 
> All three patches fix the original L3/L4 filter implementation introduced in
> 425eabddaf0f ("net: stmmac: Implement L3/L4 Filters using TC Flower").
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Patch 2: add extack messages to each -EOPNOTSUPP return (Jakub Kicinski)
> - Patch 2: return -EOPNOTSUPP directly instead of break to avoid silently
>   reporting success on unsupported FLOW_CLS_REPLACE (Sashiko review)

Please take a look at this page prior to reposting :

https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/net-next.html

There's also an announcement made on the netdev@ list when net-next
opens/closes.

You can't submit new series that target net-next during the merge window,
this revision will have to wait 2 weeks.

Maxime