Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: smsc: add missed clk_disable_unprepare in smsc_phy_probe()

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 11/14/2020 11:26 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:23:59 +0800 Zhang Changzhong wrote:
>> Add the missing clk_disable_unprepare() before return from
>> smsc_phy_probe() in the error handling case.
>>
>> Fixes: bedd8d78aba3 ("net: phy: smsc: LAN8710/20: add phy refclk in support")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/phy/smsc.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
>> index ec97669..0fc39ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/smsc.c
>> @@ -291,8 +291,10 @@ static int smsc_phy_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>  		return ret;
>>  
>>  	ret = clk_set_rate(priv->refclk, 50 * 1000 * 1000);
>> -	if (ret)
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		clk_disable_unprepare(priv->refclk);
>>  		return ret;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> The code right above looks highly questionable as well:
> 
>         priv->refclk = clk_get_optional(dev, NULL);
>         if (IS_ERR(priv->refclk))
>                 dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->refclk), "Failed to request clock\n");
>  
>         ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->refclk);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
> 
> I don't think clk_prepare_enable() will be too happy to see an error
> pointer. This should probably be:
> 
>         priv->refclk = clk_get_optional(dev, NULL);
>         if (IS_ERR(priv->refclk))
>                 return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->refclk), 
> 				      "Failed to request clock\n");

Right, especially if EPROBE_DEFER must be returned because the clock
provider is not ready yet, we should have a chance to do that.
-- 
Florian