Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net: sfp: extend SMBus support

[Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>]

> > Is there a use case for odd lengths? Apart from 1.
> 
> There's sfp_cotsworks_fixup_check() that does a 3-byte access :
> 	
> 	id->base.phys_id = SFF8024_ID_SFF_8472;
> 	id->base.phys_ext_id = SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP;
> 	id->base.connector = SFF8024_CONNECTOR_LC;
> 	sfp_write(sfp, false, SFP_PHYS_ID, &id->base, 3);

Ah, fixing those broken cotsworks PHYs.

> It may be possible to turn that into 2 2-byte accesses if we write
> 
> 	id->base.phys_id = SFF8024_ID_SFF_8472;
> 	id->base.phys_ext_id = SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP;
> 
> and then
> 
> 	id->base.phys_ext_id = SFP_PHYS_EXT_ID_SFP;
> 	id->base.connector = SFF8024_CONNECTOR_LC;

Or just don't bother fixing the EEPROM, leave it broken, but use the
corrected values internally.

> But let's first figure-out if word-only smbus are really a thing

Some grep foo on /drivers/i2c/busses might answer that.

     Andrew