From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
song@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, yhs@fb.com,
edumazet@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, mjambigi@linux.ibm.com,
wenjia@linux.ibm.com, wintera@linux.ibm.com,
dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
sidraya@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:30:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fea9adf1-3c61-4213-bc84-9429bf3e82a7@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251028121531.GA51645@j66a10360.sqa.eu95>
On 10/28/25 5:15 AM, D. Wythe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 02:33:57PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
>> This patch aims to introduce BPF injection capabilities for SMC and
>> includes a self-test to ensure code stability.
>>
>> Since the SMC protocol isn't ideal for every situation, especially
>> short-lived ones, most applications can't guarantee the absence of
>> such scenarios. Consequently, applications may need specific strategies
>> to decide whether to use SMC. For example, an application might limit SMC
>> usage to certain IP addresses or ports.
>>
>> To maintain the principle of transparent replacement, we want applications
>> to remain unaffected even if they need specific SMC strategies. In other
>> words, they should not require recompilation of their code.
>>
>> Additionally, we need to ensure the scalability of strategy implementation.
>> While using socket options or sysctl might be straightforward, it could
>> complicate future expansions.
>>
>> Fortunately, BPF addresses these concerns effectively. Users can write
>> their own strategies in eBPF to determine whether to use SMC, and they can
>> easily modify those strategies in the future.
>>
>> This is a rework of the series from [1]. Changes since [1] are limited to
>> the SMC parts:
>>
>> 1. Rename smc_ops to smc_hs_ctrl and change interface name.
>> 2. Squash SMC patches, removing standalone non-BPF hook capability.
>> 3. Fix typos
>
>
> Hi bpf folks,
>
> I've noticed this patch has been pending for a while, and I wanted to
> gently check in. Is there any specific concerns or feedback regarding
> it from the BPF side? I'm keen to address any issues and move it
> forward.
The original v1 started last year. The bpf side had been responsive but
the progress stopped for months and the smc side review had been slow
also. I doubt how well will this be supported in the future and put this
to the bottom of my list since then.
The set does not apply on bpf-next/net now. Please re-spin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-29 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-29 6:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf: export necessary symbols for modules with struct_ops D. Wythe
2025-09-29 6:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/3] net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow D. Wythe
2025-09-29 14:21 ` Dust Li
2025-09-29 6:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/3] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-10-28 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-10-29 0:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2025-10-29 6:14 ` D. Wythe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fea9adf1-3c61-4213-bc84-9429bf3e82a7@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).