From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279042D46C0; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783605711; cv=none; b=ffh8xP6yDluQpl2hVxsPLNOO379nrdtAOsrqiqT24KCuR7yiyd+XU8cpKBAaEXVpwT8zz6Kpgc1njSkxVlUU9xGcab/NsEveJBLYgb0YPrEPPSWuknZC/IuAF3sviRNVFqC65kxBBpwzcDM3TdUkob80f+Gf5LW6MgoH/AQWsKI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783605711; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bTAQUL6Sz2StfMPjLEbTGPEW7jNnBg8BscHUDvxQ2Mo=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ZNX6X3+Z//E4vfIBkk1e2yn35yixfd1WhiDCqUB4QhXc0Dk8SuKiSnR0GBg0xTuLcEi7jppcxHA5ne1rWoSMTsqwSdFhsTVjVmVyYAwBjdaDib6EtdvXhdZqKroHmucueHsB6jWcseG2UgLHMZTx+J6UqLUuVCvUIiKIEAMJwuE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=oDCz25Hs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="oDCz25Hs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1783605708; bh=bTAQUL6Sz2StfMPjLEbTGPEW7jNnBg8BscHUDvxQ2Mo=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=oDCz25HspjPFTUPqt6RTLtFKqujzSvoowoOarSysRd6Dsd+sflH8XHQ83kx7Qhoxo gS63sKeujE2TjRKoKusyOm4tVw3WwR5k/3xmsgDvxrOrIwREUlK5ZyQT7/voKANhr1 jpw8lcuBGb7ISHo6vHBZCYAOSGDX5jU80wd5MF/Kaf25j2M9IvYWgXRAJbnKJ9bsB4 zMMjY0JykG915nqU+/1WO9C/PqUsJf4lTnb5no773V5YZF0p9EKz6Fk2z/L0XUuLRa cY3fBWMQpiCKd4KKbWFAviAtmEm/o3g8STtCwP+cYuH2c26xWtL9nUq95yTqo5J+U2 nVjXv/7ifljnA== Received: from [100.64.1.21] (unknown [100.64.1.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2D1717E0D53; Thu, 09 Jul 2026 16:01:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 16:01:47 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/18] dt-bindings: clock: mediatek: Make '#clock-cells' required for MT8192 To: Louis-Alexis Eyraud , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Brian Masney , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , Chun-Jie Chen , Philipp Zabel , Edward-JW Yang , Richard Cochran Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20260709-mt8189-clocks-system-base-v2-0-2926da3db6cf@collabora.com> <20260709-mt8189-clocks-system-base-v2-2-2926da3db6cf@collabora.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20260709-mt8189-clocks-system-base-v2-2-2926da3db6cf@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/9/26 15:42, Louis-Alexis Eyraud wrote: > Both MT8192 clock controllers dt-bindings (clock and sys-clock) > document the '#clock-cells' property but do not enforce it as required > property. > As clock provider nodes should define this property in devicetrees, add > it to the required property list in both its dt-bindings files. > > Signed-off-by: Louis-Alexis Eyraud Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno