netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio_net: Disable interrupts if napi_complete_done rescheduled napi
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:08:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffcf1aa3-403e-9ff0-bd51-c507d5a52991@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171207070618-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>



On 2017年12月07日 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 01:15:15PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> Since commit 39e6c8208d7b ("net: solve a NAPI race") napi has been able
>> to be rescheduled within napi_complete_done() even in non-busypoll case,
>> but virtnet_poll() always enabled interrupts before complete, and when
>> napi was rescheduled within napi_complete_done() it did not disable
>> interrupts.
>> This caused more interrupts when event idx is disabled.
>>
>> According to commit cbdadbbf0c79 ("virtio_net: fix race in RX VQ
>> processing") we cannot place virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare() after
>> NAPI_STATE_SCHED is cleared, so disable interrupts again if
>> napi_complete_done() returned false.
>>
>> Tested with vhost-user of OVS 2.7 on host, which does not have the event
>> idx feature.
>>
>> * Before patch:
>>
>> $ netperf -t UDP_STREAM -H 192.168.150.253 -l 60 -- -m 1472
>> MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.150.253 () port 0 AF_INET
>> Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages
>> Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
>> bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 212992    1472   60.00     32763206      0    6430.32
>> 212992           60.00     23384299           4589.56
>>
>> Interrupts on guest: 9872369
>> Packets/interrupt:   2.37
>>
>> * After patch
>>
>> $ netperf -t UDP_STREAM -H 192.168.150.253 -l 60 -- -m 1472
>> MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.150.253 () port 0 AF_INET
>> Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages
>> Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
>> bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 212992    1472   60.00     32794646      0    6436.49
>> 212992           60.00     32793501           6436.27
>>
>> Interrupts on guest: 4941299
>> Packets/interrupt:   6.64
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> it might make sense in net and not -next since tx napi regressed performance
> in some configs, this might bring it back at least partially.
> Jason - what do you think?

No sure, the regression I saw was tested with event idx on. And 
virtqueue_disable_cb() does almost nothing for event idx (or even a 
little bit slower).

The patch looks good.

Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>


>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 9 ++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 19a985e..c0db48d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -261,9 +261,12 @@ static void virtqueue_napi_complete(struct napi_struct *napi,
>>   	int opaque;
>>   
>>   	opaque = virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(vq);
>> -	if (napi_complete_done(napi, processed) &&
>> -	    unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque)))
>> -		virtqueue_napi_schedule(napi, vq);
>> +	if (napi_complete_done(napi, processed)) {
>> +		if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(vq, opaque)))
>> +			virtqueue_napi_schedule(napi, vq);
>> +	} else {
>> +		virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
>> +	}
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-07  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-07  4:15 [PATCH net-next] virtio_net: Disable interrupts if napi_complete_done rescheduled napi Toshiaki Makita
2017-12-07  5:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-12-07  7:08   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-12-08 18:19     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ffcf1aa3-403e-9ff0-bd51-c507d5a52991@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).