netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bhaskar Dutta <bhaskie@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 23:33:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <g2p571fb4001005051103w67e1b9ddn3e8f7feb84d0559@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100504101301.5f4dd9c2@nehalam>

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<shemminger@vyatta.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 May 2010 22:38:49 +0530
> Bhaskar Dutta <bhaskie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 4 May 2010 19:58:32 +0530
> > > Bhaskar Dutta <bhaskie@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:
> > >> > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 09:00 +0530, Bhaskar Dutta wrote:
> > >> >> Hi,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I am observing intermittent TCP-MD5 checksum failures
> > >> >> (CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG)  on kernel 2.6.31 while talking to a BGP router.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The problem is only seen in multi-core 64 bit machines.
> > >> >> Is there any known bug in the per_cpu_ptr implementation (I am aware
> > >> >> that the percpu allocator has been re-implemented in 2.6.33) that
> > >> >> might cause a corruption in 64 bit SMP machines?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Any pointers would be appreciated.
> > >> >
> > >> > There was another recent report of incorrect MD5 signatures in
> > >> > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/159556>, but without any
> > >> > response.
> > >> >
> > >> > Ben.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> I found another thread posted back in Jan 2007 with a similar bug
> > >> (x86_64 on 2.6.20) but no replies to that as well.
> > >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/20/56
> > >
> > > 2.6.20 had lots of other MD5 bugs. Your problem might be related to
> > > GRO.  MD5 may not handle multi-fragment packets.
> > > --
> >
> > I am getting the issue on 2.6.31 and 2.6.28 (gro infrastructure was
> > added in 2.6.29).
> > Also, both segmentation offloading as well as receive offloading
> > (gso/gro) are turned off.
> >
> > Moreover outgoing TCP packets are the ones with the corrupt checksums.
> > Both tcpdump on my local machine and the BGP router on the other side
> > complain of the bad checksums with the same packet.
> >
> > I am trying to figure out if there is something in the per-cpu
> > implementation that might be causing a corruption (SMP and x86_64) but
> > I am not really getting anywhere.
>
> I seriously doubt the per-cpu stuff is the issue.
>
> > I am trying to reproduce the bad checksums with the latest kernel
> > sources since it has a new implementation of the percpu allocator.
>
> First turn off all offload settings on the device (TSO,GSO,SG,CSUM)
> then check that size of the bad packets. Are they fragmented or
> just simple linear packets?
>
> --

Hi,

TSO, GSO and SG are already turned off.
rx/tx checksumming is on, but that shouldn't matter, right?

# ethtool -k eth0
Offload parameters for eth0:
rx-checksumming: on
tx-checksumming: on
scatter-gather: off
tcp segmentation offload: off
udp fragmentation offload: off
generic segmentation offload: off

The bad packets are very small in size, most have no data at all (<300 bytes).

After adding some logs to kernel 2.6.31-12, it seems that
tcp_v4_md5_hash_skb (function that calculates the md5 hash) is
(might?) getting corrupt.

The tcp4_pseudohdr (bp = &hp->md5_blk.ip4) structure's saddr, daddr
and len fields get modified to different values towards the end of the
tcp_v4_md5_hash_skb function whenever there is a checksum error.

The tcp4_pseudohdr (bp) is within the tcp_md5sig_pool (hp), which is
filled up by tcp_get_md5sig_pool (which calls per_cpu_ptr).

Using a local copy of the tcp4_pseudohdr in the same function
tcp_v4_md5_hash_skb (copied all fields from the original
tcp4_pseudohdr within the tcp_md5sig_pool) and calculating the md5
checksum with the local  tcp4_pseudohdr seems to solve the issue
(don't see bad packets for a hours in load tests, and without the
change I can see them instantaneously in the load tests).

I am still unable to figure out how this is happening. Please let me
know if you have any pointers.

Thanks a lot!
Bhaskar

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-05 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <i2h571fb4001005031027y4a58c4dtfd28ddcdc08d8401@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-04  3:30 ` TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 11:32   ` Ben Hutchings
2010-05-04 14:28     ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 16:12       ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-04 17:08         ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 17:13           ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-05 18:03             ` Bhaskar Dutta [this message]
2010-05-05 18:53               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-06 11:55                 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-06 12:06                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  5:04                     ` David Miller
2010-05-07  5:32                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 17:14                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-07 17:21                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 17:36                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-07 21:40                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 14:55                                 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-10 15:18                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 17:27                                     ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11  4:08                                     ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11  6:27                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-11  8:23                                         ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11 20:50                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-12  3:20                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-12 22:22                                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-12 22:24                                             ` David Miller
2010-05-16 19:53                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-16 20:48                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-17  3:49                                           ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-17  5:03                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-17 17:22                                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-17 20:42                                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-17 21:04                                                 ` [PATCH] tcp: tcp_synack_options() fix Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18  5:35                                                   ` David Miller
2010-05-16  7:30                               ` TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP David Miller
2010-05-07  8:46                     ` Lars Eggert
2010-05-07  8:55                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  9:12                       ` David Miller
2010-05-07  5:39                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  8:00                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07  8:59                       ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-07  9:37                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 10:50                           ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-07 15:18                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 15:44                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 21:18                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-16  7:37                                   ` David Miller
2010-05-16  7:35                       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=g2p571fb4001005051103w67e1b9ddn3e8f7feb84d0559@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bhaskie@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).