netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rps: send IPIs ASAP
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:15:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <g2y65634d661004192215oc06d9c43xb2a7c7d946149cf5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271736519-2991-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com> wrote:
> rps: send IPIs ASAP
>
> In order to reduce latency, we'd better send IPIs ASAP to schedule the
> corresponding NAPIs.
>
A design point of RPS is that we generate at most one IPI per CPU per
device interrupt, which at least offers some predictable coalescing.
With your changes, we would get at most one IPI per packet-- that
could represent a lot more of them.  Did you test this to see what the
impact is in this regard?


> For NAPI drivers, we send IPIs immediately, and for the others, we defer them
> to NET_RX_SOFTIRQ. In this patch, we move net_rps_action() to the beginning of
> net_rx_action() to emulate a softirq with the higher priority than
> NET_RX_SOFTIRQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
> ----
>  net/core/dev.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 05a2b29..d8fca21 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2363,6 +2363,10 @@ static int enqueue_to_backlog(struct sk_buff *skb, int cpu,
>  {
>        struct softnet_data *queue;
>        unsigned long flags;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> +       bool ni = !in_irq();
> +       bool ipi = false;
> +#endif
>
>        queue = &per_cpu(softnet_data, cpu);
>
> @@ -2380,6 +2384,10 @@ enqueue:
>  #endif
>                        rps_unlock(queue);
>                        local_irq_restore(flags);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
> +                       if (ipi)
> +                               __smp_call_function_single(cpu, &queue->csd, 0);
> +#endif
>                        return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
>                }
>
> @@ -2389,6 +2397,11 @@ enqueue:
>                        if (cpu != smp_processor_id()) {
>                                struct softnet_data *myqueue;
>
> +                               if (ni) {
> +                                       ipi = true;
> +                                       goto enqueue;
> +                               }
> +
>                                myqueue = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
>                                queue->rps_ipi_next = myqueue->rps_ipi_list;
>                                myqueue->rps_ipi_list = queue;
> @@ -3337,6 +3350,7 @@ static void net_rps_action(void)
>        struct softnet_data *locqueue = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
>        struct softnet_data *remqueue = locqueue->rps_ipi_list;
>
> +       local_irq_disable();
>        if (remqueue) {
>                locqueue->rps_ipi_list = NULL;
>
> @@ -3350,9 +3364,10 @@ static void net_rps_action(void)
>                                                           &remqueue->csd, 0);
>                        remqueue = next;
>                }
> -       } else
> -#endif
> +       } else {
>                local_irq_enable();
> +       }
> +#endif
>  }
>
>  static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> @@ -3362,6 +3377,8 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
>        int budget = netdev_budget;
>        void *have;
>
> +       net_rps_action();
> +
>        local_irq_disable();
>
>        while (!list_empty(list)) {
> @@ -3423,7 +3440,7 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
>                netpoll_poll_unlock(have);
>        }
>  out:
> -       net_rps_action();
> +       local_irq_enable();
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_DMA
>        /*
>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-20  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-20  4:08 [PATCH] rps: send IPIs ASAP Changli Gao
2010-04-20  5:15 ` Tom Herbert [this message]
2010-04-20  5:39   ` David Miller
2010-04-20  5:45   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20  9:17     ` Changli Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=g2y65634d661004192215oc06d9c43xb2a7c7d946149cf5@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).