From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Held Subject: Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39 Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:50:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20110601011527.GN19505@random.random> <4DE5DCA8.7070704@fnarfbargle.com> <4DE5E29E.7080009@redhat.com> <4DE60669.9050606@fnarfbargle.com> <4DE60918.3010008@redhat.com> <4DE60940.1070107@redhat.com> <4DE61A2B.7000008@fnarfbargle.com> <20110601111841.GB3956@zip.com.au> <4DE62801.9080804@fnarfbargle.com> <20110601230342.GC3956@zip.com.au> <4DE8E3ED.7080004@fnarfbargle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DE8E3ED.7080004@fnarfbargle.com> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell: > On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote: >>> Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere >>> in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge). >>> >>> All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP addresses. >> >> Damn. Not referencing the bridge interfaces at all stopped our host from >> going down in flames when we passed it a few packets. These are two >> of the oopses we got from it. Whilst the kernel here is .35 we got the >> same issue from a range of kernels. Seems related. > > Well, I tried sending an explanatory message to netdev, netfilter & cc'd to kvm, > but it appears not to have made it to kvm or netfilter, and the cc to netdev has > not elicited a response. My resend to netfilter seems to have dropped into the > bit bucket also. Just another reference 3.5 months ago: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg17239.html Bernhard