netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: jonmason@us.ibm.com, cramerj@intel.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:09:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jeznbtg1kf.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040208074643.482ab4c7.ak@suse.de> (Andi Kleen's message of "Sun, 8 Feb 2004 07:46:43 +0100")

Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:

> On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 23:42:21 +0100
> Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
>
>> Jon D Mason <jonmason@us.ibm.com> writes:
>> 
>> > This probably isn't helpful, but it sounds like a hardware error.  Is the 
>> > error occurring on multiple/all HP adapters, or only one? 
>> 
>> I've also seen it with a HP branded BCM5701 on IA64, but also with a
>> Broadcom BCM5702 on AMD64 (both using the tg3 driver).  It seems like
>> broken UDP checksumming is rather common. :-(
>
> It could be still a software bug.  When hardware checksumming is available
> the UDP packets use a slightly different path through the stack.
>
> Could you perhaps test if the problem occurs in a 32bit box with the 
> same NIC ? Maybe it is some 64bit problem somewhere in software.

Just tested with a "3Com 3C996B-T 1000Base-T" (BCM5701 based, with tg3
driver) on an Athlon.  It shows the same bug, and disabling HW
checksumming on tx fixes it.  So it doesn't look like a 64bit issue.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-08 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-07 13:35 Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM Andreas Schwab
2004-02-07 21:37 ` Jon D Mason
2004-02-07 22:42   ` Andreas Schwab
2004-02-08  6:46     ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-08 13:09       ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
     [not found] <101E0EB68A545748974019DC227C554007CBDD@orsmsx406.jf.intel.com>
2004-02-09  0:50 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jeznbtg1kf.fsf@sykes.suse.de \
    --to=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=cramerj@intel.com \
    --cc=jonmason@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).