From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Edwards Subject: Re: Change in alloc_skb() behavior in 3.2+ kernels? Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20120606.115130.1091814494251887552.davem@davemloft.net> <20120606.131703.870120997635192180.davem@davemloft.net> <1339014685.26966.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51665 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756772Ab2FFUgP (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:36:15 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ScMxf-0007Ac-5S for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 22:36:11 +0200 Received: from dsl.comtrol.com ([64.122.56.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 22:36:11 +0200 Received: from grant.b.edwards by dsl.comtrol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 22:36:11 +0200 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2012-06-06, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 20:24 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> Is skb_tailroom() guaranteed to be >= the requested size? >> > > Of course, but only right after alloc_skb(). That's good enough. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Okay ... I'm going at home to write the "I HATE gmail.com RUBIK's CUBE HANDBOOK FOR DEAD CAT LOVERS" ...