From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NULL deref in bnx2 / crashes ? ( was: netconsole leads to stalled CPU task )
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:31:14 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <k14poh$7bs$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: k14noo$lfj$1@ger.gmane.org
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 at 07:57 GMT, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 at 14:29 GMT, Sylvain Munaut <s.munaut@whatever-company.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> The machine with the intel card still hard freeze (no output / no nothing ...)
>> The machine with the bnx2 don't crash anymore and no NULL deref, but
>> the modprobe still hangs and I get this every 180 sec or so :
>
> The NULL-deref can be reproduced easily, and Eric's patch could fix it.
> So, Eric, can you resend your patch with your SOB?
>
> I can't reproduce the hang as it is net driver specific, it is
> probably related with my patch:
>
> commit 6bdb7fe31046ac50b47e83c35cd6c6b6160a475d
> Author: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri Aug 10 01:24:50 2012 +0000
>
> netpoll: re-enable irq in poll_napi()
>
Could you test the following patch?
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index ddc453b..ed4d1e4 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -166,11 +166,18 @@ static int poll_one_napi(struct netpoll_info *npinfo,
static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct napi_struct *napi;
+ LIST_HEAD(napi_list);
int budget = 16;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
- list_for_each_entry(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
+ /* After we enable the IRQ, new entries could be added
+ * to this list, we need to save it before re-enable
+ * IRQ.
+ */
+ list_splice_tail(&dev->napi_list, &napi_list);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(napi, &napi_list, dev_list) {
local_irq_enable();
if (napi->poll_owner != smp_processor_id() &&
spin_trylock(&napi->poll_lock)) {
@@ -187,6 +194,7 @@ static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev)
}
local_irq_disable();
}
+ list_splice_tail(&napi_list, &dev->napi_list);
}
static void service_arp_queue(struct netpoll_info *npi)
However, it seems we should take rtnl lock to make sure dev->napi_list
is really safe, I am not sure if the following one makes sense.
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index ddc453b..7770e2b 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -170,8 +170,9 @@ static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev)
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
+ local_irq_enable();
+ rtnl_lock();
list_for_each_entry(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
- local_irq_enable();
if (napi->poll_owner != smp_processor_id() &&
spin_trylock(&napi->poll_lock)) {
rcu_read_lock_bh();
@@ -180,13 +181,12 @@ static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev)
rcu_read_unlock_bh();
spin_unlock(&napi->poll_lock);
- if (!budget) {
- local_irq_disable();
+ if (!budget)
break;
- }
}
- local_irq_disable();
}
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ local_irq_disable();
}
static void service_arp_queue(struct netpoll_info *npi)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-22 10:53 NULL deref in bnx2 / crashes ? ( was: netconsole leads to stalled CPU task ) Sylvain Munaut
2012-08-22 11:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 12:17 ` Sylvain Munaut
2012-08-22 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 14:29 ` Sylvain Munaut
2012-08-22 15:40 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-23 7:57 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-23 8:31 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-08-23 9:12 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-24 9:50 ` Sylvain Munaut
2012-08-25 8:01 ` Cong Wang
2012-08-25 2:20 ` Lin Ming
2012-09-12 11:53 ` Sylvain Munaut
2012-09-12 12:49 ` Cong Wang
2012-09-12 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-13 17:35 ` Sylvain Munaut
2012-09-14 13:22 ` Cong Wang
2012-09-14 15:36 ` Sylvain Munaut
2012-09-17 10:57 ` Sylvain Munaut
2012-09-17 15:17 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='k14poh$7bs$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).