From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] ipv6 route: Do not attach neighbour on route. Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <50F463E5.7070206@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60110 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752734Ab3AOChm (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:37:42 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TuwPU-0003k0-Kw for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 03:37:56 +0100 Received: from 14.205.39.94 ([14.205.39.94]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 03:37:56 +0100 Received: from xiyou.wangcong by 14.205.39.94 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 03:37:56 +0100 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 at 20:00 GMT, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote: > Not tested, just an RFC. > Depends on previous new_neigh removal from netevent patch (sorry). > Forgot to define __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref()?