From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: remove the central spinlock Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 05:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1368068665.13473.81.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40487 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750724Ab3EIFoO (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2013 01:44:14 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UaJeG-0004Hh-P6 for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:12 +0200 Received: from 116.53.101.117 ([116.53.101.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:12 +0200 Received: from xiyou.wangcong by 116.53.101.117 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:12 +0200 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 09 May 2013 at 03:04 GMT, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > +#if 0 > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nf_conntrack_locks); i++) > + arch_spin_lock_init(&nf_conntrack_locks[i]); > +#endif > + Is this intentional?