From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org, robert@herjulf.net,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:50:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <l2y412e6f7f1004141950v6db4978azfbf332cf15cf45fa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271299206.16881.1764.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Agree 100%, and irqbalance is the existing daemon. It should be used and
> changed if necessary.
>
> Changli, my stronges argument about your patches is that our scheduler
> and memory affinity api (numactl driven) is bitmask oriented, giving the
> same weight to individual cpu or individual memory node.
>
It works with the assumption: the workloads handled in non-schedulable
context are less than the others. If most of work is done in
non-schedulable(softirq) context, scheduler can't keep load balance.
--
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-15 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-07 18:42 rps: question jamal
2010-02-08 5:58 ` Tom Herbert
2010-02-08 15:09 ` jamal
2010-04-14 11:53 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: " jamal
2010-04-14 17:31 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 18:53 ` jamal
2010-04-14 19:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-14 19:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 8:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:22 ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 20:38 ` jamal
2010-04-14 20:45 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 20:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-14 22:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-14 23:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15 2:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-15 2:50 ` Changli Gao [this message]
2010-04-15 8:57 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 12:10 ` jamal
2010-04-15 12:32 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 12:50 ` jamal
2010-04-15 23:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-15 8:51 ` David Miller
2010-04-14 20:34 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-15 8:50 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 8:48 ` David Miller
2010-04-15 11:55 ` jamal
2010-04-15 16:41 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 20:16 ` jamal
2010-04-15 20:25 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-15 23:56 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 5:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 6:02 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 6:28 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-16 6:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 13:42 ` jamal
2010-04-16 7:15 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:27 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:37 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:58 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:21 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:34 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 13:49 ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:10 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-16 14:43 ` jamal
2010-04-16 14:58 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:48 ` jamal
2010-04-17 7:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 8:43 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 9:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 14:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 17:26 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 14:17 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: remove time limit in process_backlog() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 9:36 ` David Miller
2010-04-17 17:31 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-18 9:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-18 11:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 2:09 ` jamal
2010-04-19 9:37 ` [RFC] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 9:48 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 12:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 12:28 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-19 13:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 14:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] " Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 16:02 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-19 20:21 ` David Miller
2010-04-20 7:17 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: cleanups Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 8:18 ` David Miller
2010-04-19 23:56 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: shortcut net_rps_action() Changli Gao
2010-04-20 0:32 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-20 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 12:02 ` rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question jamal
2010-04-20 13:13 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1271853570.4032.21.camel@bigi>
2010-04-21 19:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 1:27 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-22 12:12 ` jamal
2010-04-25 2:31 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-26 11:35 ` jamal
2010-04-26 13:35 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-21 21:53 ` Rick Jones
2010-04-16 15:57 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-14 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-04-15 8:42 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=l2y412e6f7f1004141950v6db4978azfbf332cf15cf45fa@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert@herjulf.net \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).