From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gopala krishnan Subject: Re: Flooded with bonding: bond0: doing slave updates when interface is down. Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87mxzj6eyx.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:38184 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751305Ab0DMJkF (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:40:05 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O1cbD-0005Bo-OX for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:40:04 +0200 Received: from ABTS-TN-Static-236.54.165.122.airtelbroadband.in ([ABTS-TN-Static-236.54.165.122.airtelbroadband.in]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:40:03 +0200 Received: from gopu.0206 by ABTS-TN-Static-236.54.165.122.airtelbroadband.in with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:40:03 +0200 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi I have a question, Before adding a slave to a bond, is it we require to mave the slave interface down and add the slave to the bond and make the slave up. Then the traffic will be disruptive when adding a slave to the bond.