From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/20] Batch network namespace cleanup Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:48:29 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4B137D4B.8050803@gmail.com> <20091130.000918.212899174.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, hadi@cyberus.ca, dlezcano@fr.ibm.com, adobriyan@gmail.com, kaber@trash.net To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:45896 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751071AbZK3Is3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:48:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon\, 30 Nov 2009 00\:17\:59 -0800") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > David Miller writes: > >> From: Eric Dumazet >> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:07:39 +0100 >> >>> It seems list received part of your patches Eric >>> >>> 01, 07-20 are OK, 02-06 are missing >> >> Not just the list, I didn't get copies of the missing patches through >> direct email even though I was on the CC: list. > > Thanks. Weird. I will take a look and resend. I have resent the missing patches, I'm not certain what happened the first time but clearly those didn't get sent. 02 and 06 have made it to netdev and looped back to me. I'm not certain where 03-05 are, but they should be in transit. Eric