From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [RFC] arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip conflict verification Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:46:15 -0700 Message-ID: References: <200907030246.18054.denys@visp.net.lb> <200907031402.34941.denys@visp.net.lb> <20090703.132005.113285172.davem@davemloft.net> <200907032337.16065.denys@visp.net.lb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Denys Fedoryschenko Return-path: Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:48735 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751535AbZGDAqR (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 20:46:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200907032337.16065.denys@visp.net.lb> (Denys Fedoryschenko's message of "Fri\, 3 Jul 2009 23\:37\:15 +0300") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Denys Fedoryschenko writes: > On Friday 03 July 2009 23:20:05 David Miller wrote: > >> I really never should have applied your initial patch, I severely >> regret it. Thanksfully it's reverted now and we can look into >> this issue more properly. > If it was said before... > > Then maybe i will try to do some new sysctl value? > > By default it will be old behavior, but it can be changed to new on user > choice. > > Let's say > > net.ipv4.arp_proxy_gateway > net.ipv4.arp_proxy_gratuitous How do machines with addresses without routes to them get packets from machines in other subnets? Eric