From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add network namespace clone & unshare support. Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:00:23 -0600 Message-ID: References: <46FB6F1E.8070105@fr.ibm.com> <20070927.124552.69400277.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:40968 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756948AbXI0XBS (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:01:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070927.124552.69400277.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:45:52 -0700 (PDT)") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > Eric, pick an appropriate new non-conflicting number NOW. Done. My apologies for the confusion. I thought the way Cedric and the IBM guys were testing someone would have shouted at me long before now. > This adds unnecessary extra work for Andrew Morton, which he has > enough of already. Cedric made a good point that we will have conflicts of code being added to the same place in nsproxy.c and the like. So I copied Andrew to give him a heads up. I will gladly do what I can, to help. Working against 3 trees development at the moment is a bit of a development challenge. Eric