From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@sw.ru>
Cc: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [NETNS] Oops in register_pernet_operations() with CONFIG_NET_NS=n
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:03:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1bqan6xti.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4720A181.3060003@sw.ru> (Denis V. Lunev's message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:00:33 +0400")
"Denis V. Lunev" <den@sw.ru> writes:
> The patch attached should help. The idea is simple. The "init" should be
> called only once without NETNS. Period. No need for any lists.
>
> I'll resend it to Dave after the ACK.
First in the case of the code that is currently merged none of
the __net_init __net_exit or __net_initdata can be modular, so for
2.6.24 there is no fix needed. Yeah.
Second the whole concept of concept pernet_operations being __init
doesn't work when you have modular code that calls unregister_pernet_subsys().
Because unregister calls the exit method from the pernet_operations
structure. So the patch doesn't even begin to address the real
issue.
Third from my perspective CONFIG_NET_NS is a temporary measure
designed to last only until we have enough implementation experience
so that we can feel comfortable removing the experimental status of
the network namespace work. It was not my intention for it to be a
space saving measure. So I think it is silly to go marking up the
patches in development with __net_initdata etc.
At least so far I think __net_initdata is a totally bogus concept
and I'm not certain about the other two.
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-25 12:59 [NETNS] Oops in register_pernet_operations() with CONFIG_NET_NS=n Benjamin Thery
2007-10-25 14:00 ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-10-25 14:14 ` [Devel] Re: [NETNS] Oops in register_pernet_operations() with CONFIG_NET_NS=n (resend, was wrong patch) Denis V. Lunev
2007-10-25 14:50 ` [NETNS] Oops in register_pernet_operations() with CONFIG_NET_NS=n Benjamin Thery
2007-10-25 15:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-25 15:10 ` Benjamin Thery
2007-10-25 16:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-25 16:52 ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-10-25 17:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-26 11:31 ` David Miller
2007-10-26 11:41 ` Benjamin Thery
2007-10-26 11:55 ` David Miller
2007-10-26 23:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-26 23:45 ` [PATCH] net: Marking struct pernet_operations __net_initdata was inappropriate Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-27 5:55 ` David Miller
2007-10-27 6:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-27 7:29 ` David Miller
2007-10-25 15:03 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1bqan6xti.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=benjamin.thery@bull.net \
--cc=clg@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=den@sw.ru \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).