netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-2.6 patch 1/2][NETNS] fix device renaming for sysfs
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:59:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1fxrtpg06.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080430213320.825349005@localhost.localdomain> (Daniel Lezcano's message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:31:14 +0200")

Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com> writes:

> When a netdev is moved across namespaces with the 'dev_change_net_namespace' 
> function, the 'device_rename' function is used to fixup kobject and refresh 
> the sysfs tree. The device_rename function will call kobject_rename and this
> one will check if there is an object with the same name and this is the case
> because we are renaming the object with the same name.
>
> The use of 'device_rename' seems for me wrong because we usually don't
> rename it but just move it across namespaces. As we just want to do a 
> mini "netdev_[un]register", IMO the functions 'netdev_[un]register_kobject' 
> should be used instead, like an usual network device [un]registering.

device_rename is correct.  Because doing device_del; device_add removes
any driver specific sysfs attributes.

Causing your patch to introduce subtle driver breakage only when we
move a network device between namespaces.  Ouch!

To support this operation we need something like device_rename that
can preserve driver specific attributes, and generally handle
movement between namespaces.  Since device_rename already does 99% of
what we need it to do I found it easier to extend device_rename to
handle this case then to introduce yet another function into the
kobject layer.

> This patch replace device_rename by netdev_unregister_kobject, followed by
> netdev_register_kobject.

And sysfs comes a' tumblin' down.

My apologies for not replying sooner I just spotted this.

Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-30 21:31 [net-2.6 patch 0/2][NETNS] netns fixes Daniel Lezcano
2008-04-30 21:31 ` [net-2.6 patch 1/2][NETNS] fix device renaming for sysfs Daniel Lezcano
2008-05-03  0:01   ` David Miller
2008-06-04 11:59   ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2008-06-04 13:50     ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-04-30 21:31 ` [net-2.6 patch 2/2][NETNS] Fix reassembly timer to use the right namespace Daniel Lezcano
2008-05-03  0:02   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1fxrtpg06.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).