From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] inetpeer: Support ipv6 addresses. Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:43:46 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20100328082250.GA14053@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100328.055312.58421329.davem@davemloft.net> <20100328131112.GA15984@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100328.064012.193708716.davem@davemloft.net> <20100328135931.GA16430@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:47620 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757108Ab0CaFnv (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:43:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100328135931.GA16430@gondor.apana.org.au> (Herbert Xu's message of "Sun\, 28 Mar 2010 21\:59\:31 +0800") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Herbert Xu writes: > BTW, it appears that the inetpeer cache doesn't take namespaces > into account. This means that information could potentially leak > from one namespace into another. I'm not sure whether that's a > big deal or not but it's something for the namespaces folks to > consider. Bother. I wrote a patch a while back, I even remember people commenting on it, but it certainly doesn't look like anything ever made it in. I will see if I can make some time to dig that up and post the patch. Thanks for noticing, Eric