From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] netns: sysfs: add a netns suffix to net device sysfs entries Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:46:56 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20081022152144.351965414@theryb.frec.bull.fr> <49006671.3010804@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev , Dave Miller , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Al Viro , Serge Hallyn , Daniel Lezcano , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Denis Lunev , Linux Containers To: Benjamin Thery Return-path: Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:34746 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752335AbYJWPyc (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:54:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49006671.3010804@bull.net> (Benjamin Thery's message of "Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:56:33 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Benjamin Thery writes: > In fact, I feared that would be an issue before I sent the patches. > Thanks for confirming this. > > But, as this alternative was discussed a bit after Al's comments on your > last patches, I had to give it a try and code a proof-of-concept. Yes. We have a lot of reasons now for why that approach is a bad idea. Which should help a lot when it comes to handling sysfs properly. Eric