From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make /proc/net a symlink on /proc/self/net (v2)
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 08:57:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1od9r26bu.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47CFB6CA.8090001@openvz.org> (Pavel Emelyanov's message of "Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:18:02 +0300")
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> writes:
> Current /proc/net is done with so called "shadows", but current
> implementation is broken and has little chances to get fixed.
>
> The problem is that dentries subtree of /proc/net directory has
> fancy revalidation rules to make processes living in different
> net namespaces see different entries in /proc/net subtree, but
> currently, tasks see in the /proc/net subdir the contents of any
> other namespace, depending on who opened the file first.
>
> The proposed fix is to turn /proc/net into a symlink, which points
> to /proc/self/net, which in turn shows what previously was in
> /proc/net - the network-related info, from the net namespace the
> appropriate task lives in.
>
> # ls -l /proc/net
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Mar 5 15:17 /proc/net -> self/net
>
> In other words - this behaves like /proc/mounts, but unlike
> "mounts", "net" is not a file, but a directory.
>
> Fixed a task_struct leak in get_proc_task_net, pointed out by Paul.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Before I forget.
As a future patch we need to implement a d_revalidate rule for
/proc/<pid>/task/net that will notice we have unshared a network
namespace and flush all cached dentries for the old network namespace.
Since unsharing happens rarely if at all this d_revalidate should
be relatively cheap, and since the change is real and for everyone
it will not suffer from the inconsistencies that plagued us when
working with d_revalidate on /proc/net.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-06 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-06 9:18 [PATCH] Make /proc/net a symlink on /proc/self/net (v2) Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-06 12:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-06 15:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-03-06 15:57 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2008-03-06 16:35 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-06 16:45 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-06 19:43 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-07 12:03 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-07 13:24 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1od9r26bu.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).