From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Security: Implement prctl(PR_SET_NETWORK, PR_NETWORK_OFF) semantics. Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:18:22 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1260977452-2334-1-git-send-email-michael@laptop.org> <1260977565-2379-2-git-send-email-michael@laptop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, "Andi Kleen" , "David Lang" , "Oliver Hartkopp" , "Alan Cox" , "Herbert Xu" , "Valdis Kletnieks" , "Bryan Donlan" , "Evgeniy Polyakov" , "C. Scott Ananian" , "James Morris" , "Bernie Innocenti" , "Mark Seaborn" To: Michael Stone Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1260977565-2379-2-git-send-email-michael@laptop.org> (Michael Stone's message of "Wed\, 16 Dec 2009 10\:32\:44 -0500") Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Michael Stone writes: > diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c > index 23bd09c..5b38db0 100644 > --- a/kernel/ptrace.c > +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c > @@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode) > dumpable = get_dumpable(task->mm); > if (!dumpable && !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE)) > return -EPERM; > + if (current->network) > + return -EPERM; The principle should be: you gain no privileges by ptracing. Therefore this check should be: if (current->network && !task->network) return -EPERM; Which keeps the ptrace logic from being a larger hammer than it needs to be. Eric