From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix deadlock in netconsole with no carrier
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:47:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1pswhy7j8.fsf@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050419170650.GW21897@waste.org> (Matt Mackall's message of "Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:06:50 -0700")
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> writes:
[sorry for the late answer, but you dont seem to have cced the
answer to me so I lost it until now]
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:53:50PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>> I got a deadlock at boot with netconsole when the netword card
>> did not have a cable connected. This patch fixes this by limiting
>> the number of retries.
>
> It should be waiting for carrier detect before proceeding. What NIC is that?
e1000
> I'm sure five retries is not enough.
Well, infinite is definitely too many. And the early netconsole
code already waits for carrier up, so waiting even longer in the
actual write does not make much sense to me. The problem with
spinning longer here is that when you boot on a system with no
carrier but netconsole configured it will waste a lot of time
uselessly spinning/polling here all the time. It is better
to end this early. In theory you could do a more clever backoff
scheme and note when a device is always down, but I think
the short retry combined with the long wait at early netconsole
init is nearly equivalent.
Without this patch my setup doesnt even boot so I would
appreciate if the patch could be applied.
>
>> Also when we run into the device spinlock dont poll all the time,
>> just spin.
>
> Two patches? Again, I don't think we should give up so easily.
For the device spinlock polling is useless because the
NIC is not actually out of resources, all you need to do
is to spin. Polling too is a waste of CPU time.
In case polling is really needed (in case of a race) it will
be retried once the spinlock is free.
-Andi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-26 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-19 13:53 [PATCH] Fix deadlock in netconsole with no carrier Andi Kleen
2005-04-19 17:06 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-26 13:47 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1pswhy7j8.fsf@muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).