From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:39:45 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1221483926.30816.18.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20080917125053.1f9ecf37.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200809171724.36269.paul.moore@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Stephen Smalley , jmorris@namei.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Moore Return-path: Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:42872 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753164AbYIQVpX (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:45:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200809171724.36269.paul.moore@hp.com> (Paul Moore's message of "Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Paul Moore writes: > We suck? Maybe, but some explanation about why we suck in this > particular case would be helpful as far as I'm concerned. I don't > really care about identifying the guilty suckees, I'm more interested > in finding out what happened to cause us to suck because of this. Agreed. I believe we carefully gave selinux the same paths for /proc/net that it had before so I don't know why this affects user space. I know we had some selinux review when we made the change. Eric