From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] netns support in the kobject layer Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 13:58:44 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20100506200404.GA21805@kroah.com> <20100515.232643.212422307.davem@davemloft.net> <20100517181133.GB18721@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , gregkh@suse.de, kay.sievers@vrfy.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, bcrl@lhnet.ca, serue@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100517181133.GB18721@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Mon\, 17 May 2010 11\:11\:33 -0700") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Greg KH writes: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:26:43PM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Greg KH >> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:04:04 -0700 >> >> > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:35:54PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> >> >> With the tagged sysfs support finally merged into Greg's tree, >> >> it is time for the last little bits of work to get the kobject >> >> layer and network namespaces to play together properly. >> >> >> >> These patches are roughly evenly divided between network layer work >> >> and sysfs layer work. Last time this conundrum came up I believe >> >> we decided that the easiest way to handle this was for Greg to carry >> >> all of the patches. David, Greg does that still make sense? >> > >> > That's fine, if I get David's ack on these. >> >> Looks good to me: >> >> Acked-by: David S. Miller > > Ok. Eric, can you resend these to me when .35-rc1 is out so I can queue > them up then to get some testing in linux-next so that they can make it > into .36? Grumble. Grumble. Grumble. If I must I will resend these, but these patches are already in production use, and I had them to you weeks before the merge window closed. Is there no way we can get these in for 2.6.35? Eric