From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [RFC] [patch 0/6] [Network namespace] introduction Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 03:22:15 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20060609210202.215291000@localhost.localdomain> <449274A3.5050304@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: serue@us.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:8083 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750839AbWFPJWl (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:22:41 -0400 To: Daniel Lezcano In-Reply-To: <449274A3.5050304@fr.ibm.com> (Daniel Lezcano's message of "Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:06:43 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Daniel Lezcano writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > Have you seen my previous work in this direction? >> I know I had a much much more complete implementation. The only part >> I had not completed was iptables support and that was about a days >> more work. > > No, I didn't see your work, is it possible to send me a pointer on it or to have > a patchset of your code ? It is in my git tree up on kernel.org. I think it is in my proof-of-concept branch. The individual commits tell a tangled tale that is definitely unacceptable for an upstream merge but the actual result is interesting. If that isn't enough to find it, tell me and I will track down the details. It has been a couple months since I posted it during the design discussion and I'm way overdue for being in bed, tonight. Eric