Re: [PATCH net 1/8] tools: ynl-gen: don't declare loop iterator in place

[Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>]

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:

> The codegen tries to follow the "old" C style and declare loop
> iterators at the start of the block / function. Only nested
> request handling breaks this style, so adjust it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py b/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py
> index a1427c537030..305f5696bc4f 100755
> --- a/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py
> +++ b/tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py
> @@ -654,10 +654,10 @@ from lib import SpecFamily, SpecAttrSet, SpecAttr, SpecOperation, SpecEnumSet, S
>      def attr_put(self, ri, var):
>          if self.attr['type'] in scalars:
>              put_type = self.type
> -            ri.cw.p(f"for (unsigned int i = 0; i < {var}->n_{self.c_name}; i++)")
> +            ri.cw.p(f"for (i = 0; i < {var}->n_{self.c_name}; i++)")
>              ri.cw.p(f"ynl_attr_put_{put_type}(nlh, {self.enum_name}, {var}->{self.c_name}[i]);")
>          elif 'type' not in self.attr or self.attr['type'] == 'nest':
> -            ri.cw.p(f"for (unsigned int i = 0; i < {var}->n_{self.c_name}; i++)")
> +            ri.cw.p(f"for (i = 0; i < {var}->n_{self.c_name}; i++)")
>              self._attr_put_line(ri, var, f"{self.nested_render_name}_put(nlh, " +
>                                  f"{self.enum_name}, &{var}->{self.c_name}[i])")
>          else:
> @@ -1644,11 +1644,23 @@ _C_KW = {
>  
>  
>  def put_req_nested(ri, struct):
> +    local_vars = []
> +    init_lines = []
> +
> +    local_vars.append('struct nlattr *nest;')
> +    init_lines.append("nest = ynl_attr_nest_start(nlh, attr_type);")

Minor nit: the series uses += ['...'] elsewhere, is it worth being
consistent?

Either way,
Reviewed-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>