netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,  "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	 Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@gmail.com>,  Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	 donald.hunter@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] tools/net/ynl: add async notification handling
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:06:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2cyj2uj11.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241109134011.560db783@kernel.org> (Jakub Kicinski's message of "Sat, 9 Nov 2024 13:40:11 -0800")

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:

> On Fri,  8 Nov 2024 12:38:16 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote:
>> +    def poll_ntf(self, interval=0.1, duration=None):
>> +        endtime = time.time() + duration if duration else None
>
> could we default duration to 0 and always check endtime?
> I think we can assume that time doesn't go back for simplicity

I don't follow; what are you suggesting I initialise endtime to when
duration is 0 ?

>> +        while True:
>> +            try:
>> +                self.check_ntf()
>> +                yield self.async_msg_queue.get_nowait()
>> +            except queue.Empty:
>> +                try:
>> +                    time.sleep(interval)
>
> Maybe select or epoll would be better that periodic checks?

This was the limit of my python knowledge TBH. I can try using python
selectors but I suspect periodic checks will still be needed to reliably
check the endtime.

>> +                except KeyboardInterrupt:
>> +                    return
>> +            if endtime and endtime < time.time():
>> +                return

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-11 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08 12:38 [PATCH net-next v1 0/2] tools/net/ynl: rework async notification handling Donald Hunter
2024-11-08 12:38 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/2] Revert "tools/net/ynl: improve async notification handling" Donald Hunter
2024-11-08 12:38 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] tools/net/ynl: add async notification handling Donald Hunter
2024-11-09 21:40   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-11 11:06     ` Donald Hunter [this message]
2024-11-11 18:03       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-12  9:16         ` Donald Hunter
2024-11-12 15:14           ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2cyj2uj11.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaw.leon@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).