From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/4] Delete token ring support. Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:48:15 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1337128544-18680-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Gortmaker Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:33495 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758480Ab2EPAsQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 20:48:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1337128544-18680-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> (Paul Gortmaker's message of "Tue, 15 May 2012 20:35:40 -0400") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Paul Gortmaker writes: > > What I mean by (2) is the implicit absence of anyone fixing _runtime_ > bugs, going all the way back to 2.6.12 in 2005. If the code was being > _used_, we'd see runtime regressions reported and their associated > fixes. Removal sounds good to me. In fact I would argue to remove any other driver which did not get a real change since 2005 too. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only