From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 19:51:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <464034CF.20700@wpkg.org> <20070508155201.GA1251@xi.wantstofly.org> <4640B3EE.1020707@wpkg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Lennert Buytenhek , Alexey Zaytsev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michael Jones To: Tomasz Chmielewski Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:47259 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966751AbXEHRvb (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2007 13:51:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4640B3EE.1020707@wpkg.org> (Tomasz Chmielewski's message of "Tue, 08 May 2007 19:31:26 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Tomasz Chmielewski writes: > Does using ixp4xx on LE have any other drawbacks than inferior network > performance? More memory is needed, something like max 600 KB for 2 Ethernet ports. > And talking about network performance, what numbers are we talking > about (LE vs BE; 30% performance hit on LE, more, or less)? Haven't checked yet but I'd expect something like that. -- Krzysztof Halasa