From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Subject: Re: e100 in 2.5.59 through 2.5.61
Date: 17 Feb 2003 11:03:18 -0500
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <m37kbyc2t5.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org>
References: <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E01780B72@orsmsx402.jf.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E01780B72@orsmsx402.jf.intel.com>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

>>>>> "Scott" == Feldman, Scott <scott.feldman@intel.com> writes:

>> The switch is fine with other 100 devices, such as the printer and
>> the 802.11 gateway.  It is also happy with the 3com card in the
>> laptop's port duplicator.

Scott> Switch vendor/model?

Good point.  It is a Belkin F5D5130-8 8-port 10/100.
 
>> Both the e100 and the eepro100 modules fail at 100baseT.

Scott> Is the switch port forced or autoneg?

Autoneg.  

-JimC