netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
	PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
	John Ronciak <john.ronciak@intel.com>
Subject: E100 RX ring buffers continued...
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:09:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m38whchrer.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> (raw)

Hi,

E100 RX buffers seem more problematic than I though.
The descriptor doesn't contain the address of the data buffer. Instead,
the descriptor is to be followed by the data buffer immediately. It's
not only the driver invention :-(

The manual mentions it's the only mode supported, aka "simplified mode".
There is also apparently unsupported and mostly undocumented "flexible
mode". The question to Intel's experts: can the flexible mode be used
anyway? I can write the code, but need info about eg. the data
structures (RFD, how does it work in flexible mode) and a confirmation
the silicon (or maybe which silicon) will work with it.

TIA.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa

             reply	other threads:[~2009-08-22 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-22 14:09 Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2009-08-22 15:32 ` E100 RX ring buffers continued Krzysztof Halasa
2009-08-23  1:15 ` David Miller
2009-08-23 15:30   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-08-23 18:20     ` Walt Holman
2009-08-23 20:43       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-08-24  2:03         ` David Miller
     [not found]           ` <m3bpm5v65e.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
2009-08-24 20:10             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m38whchrer.fsf@intrepid.localdomain \
    --to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).