From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benny Amorsen Subject: Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down Date: 20 Dec 2006 21:40:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200612191959.43019.david-b@pacbell.net> <20061220042648.GA19814@srcf.ucam.org> <200612192114.49920.david-b@pacbell.net> <20061220053417.GA29877@suse.de> <20061220055209.GA20483@srcf.ucam.org> <1166601025.3365.1345.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061220125314.GA24188@srcf.ucam.org> <1166621931.3365.1384.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061220152701.GA22928@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1166628858.3365.1425.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20061220164054.GA27938@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1166635300.3365.1442.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org >>>>> "AvdV" == Arjan van de Ven writes: AvdV> even if you have NO power savings you still don't meet your AvdV> criteria. That's basic ethernet for you.... AvdV> That's what I was trying to say; your criteria is unrealistic AvdV> regardless of what the kernel does, ethernet already dictates 30 AvdV> to 45 seconds there. Can you get to such high numbers without STP? /Benny