From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, c.aeschlimann@acn-group.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix IXP4xx coherent allocations
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:22:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3d2uhdl1l.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130330132915.GB17995@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:29:15 +0000")
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> I'm having a hard time understanding what is an ARM issue here, what is
> an ARM bug, and what the DMA API requires. The DMA API documentation
> is extremely sparse in describing what's required of the DMA masks,
> what these functions are supposed to do, and what determines whether
> a mask is "possible" or not.
>
> Moreover, I'm also having a hard time understanding what broke in 3.7,
> and why this fixes it.
>
> In other words, I'm completely failing to understand everything about
> this patch.
The ARM issue here is that the coherent DMA mask, by default, is zero
(i.e. coherent allocations are impossible by default UNLESS the device
pointer supplied is NULL - since DMA masks are bound to devices).
On most other platforms, the default DMA mask is 0xFFFFFFFF = (u32)-1
and this is also required by the DMA API.
In v3.7 (between v3.7-rc6 and v3.7-rc7), Xi Wang noticed that IXP4xx net
drivers call dma_pool_create() with NULL dev argument, and changed them
to use &port->netdev->dev. This broke coherent allocations since now the
device supplied to dma_pool_create() is not NULL and the (zero) mask
prevents coherent allocations. This means the Ethernet and HSS drivers
are since then unusable.
The first part of my patch makes dma_set_coherent_mask (IXP4xx-only
code) actually set the mask. This is needed as on IXP4xx we have (at
least) two different situations:
- PCI devices want "DMA zone" memory (26 bits = 64 MiB)
- built-in devices can use any RAM (32 bits = 4 GiB).
Without the patch, dma_set_coherent_mask only returns 0 or -EIO, it
doesn't change the actual coherent DMA mask and it's then impossible for
coherent allocators to differentiate between the above two cases.
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common-pci.c
@@ -454,10 +454,15 @@ int ixp4xx_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
{
- if (mask >= SZ_64M - 1)
- return 0;
+ if ((mask & DMA_BIT_MASK(26)) != DMA_BIT_MASK(26))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ /* PCI devices are limited to 64 MiB */
+ if (dev_is_pci(dev))
+ mask &= DMA_BIT_MASK(26); /* Use DMA region */
- return -EIO;
+ dev->coherent_dma_mask = mask;
+ return 0;
}
The second part of my patch sets the coherent DMA masks of the Ethernet
and HSS devices to 4 GiB (the value which should already be the
default). This also seems to be a recommended action.
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/xscale/ixp4xx_eth.c
@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ static int eth_init_one(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev->ethtool_ops = &ixp4xx_ethtool_ops;
dev->tx_queue_len = 100;
-
+ dma_set_coherent_mask(&dev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
netif_napi_add(dev, &port->napi, eth_poll, NAPI_WEIGHT);
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c
@@ -1367,6 +1367,7 @@ static int hss_init_one(struct platform_device *pdev)
port->dev = &pdev->dev;
port->plat = pdev->dev.platform_data;
+ dma_set_coherent_mask(&dev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
netif_napi_add(dev, &port->napi, hss_hdlc_poll, NAPI_WEIGHT);
--
Krzysztof Halasa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-30 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-23 19:35 [PATCH] Fix IXP4xx coherent allocations Krzysztof Halasa
2013-03-23 23:57 ` David Miller
2013-03-24 19:11 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-24 21:15 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2013-03-30 13:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-30 14:22 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2013-03-30 15:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-01 20:17 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2013-04-02 0:40 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-30 13:18 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3d2uhdl1l.fsf@intrepid.localdomain \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=c.aeschlimann@acn-group.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).