From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH] wan/sdla section fixes Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:50:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20060608203616.16796ec3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev , mike.mclagan@linux.org, akpm Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:16769 "EHLO khc.piap.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750842AbWFLRuX (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:50:23 -0400 To: "Randy.Dunlap" In-Reply-To: <20060608203616.16796ec3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (Randy Dunlap's message of "Thu, 8 Jun 2006 20:36:16 -0700") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi, "Randy.Dunlap" writes: > Priority: tossup. > netdev->set_config can be called at any time, so these references > to __initdata would be a real problem. > However, problem has not been observed AFAIK. > > Fix section mismatch warnings: > WARNING: drivers/net/wan/sdla.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .text between 'sdla_set_config' (at offset 0x1b8e) and 'sdla_stats' > WARNING: drivers/net/wan/sdla.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.data: from .text between 'sdla_set_config' (at offset 0x1e76) and 'sdla_stats' Is sdla.c still in use? I remember someone mentioned that Sangoma drivers are now outside the kernel but I don't know how do they relate to sdla.c and friend(s). > static const char* version = "SDLA driver v0.30, 12 Sep 1996, > mike.mclagan@linux.org"; 1996 doesn't look encouraging but it may be misleading. -- Krzysztof Halasa