From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] WAN: fix Cisco HDLC handshaking.
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:16:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3iqeoh7at.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> (raw)
WAN: fix Cisco HDLC handshaking.
Cisco HDLC uses keepalive packets and sequence numbers to determine link
state. In rare cases both ends could transmit keepalive packets at the same
time, causing the received sequence numbers to be treated as incorrect.
Now we accept our current sequence number as well as the previous one.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Hałasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_cisco.c b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_cisco.c
index cf5fd17..f1bff98 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_cisco.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_cisco.c
@@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ struct cisco_state {
spinlock_t lock;
unsigned long last_poll;
int up;
- int request_sent;
- u32 txseq; /* TX sequence number */
+ u32 txseq; /* TX sequence number, 0 = none */
u32 rxseq; /* RX sequence number */
};
@@ -163,6 +162,7 @@ static int cisco_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
struct cisco_packet *cisco_data;
struct in_device *in_dev;
__be32 addr, mask;
+ u32 ack;
if (skb->len < sizeof(struct hdlc_header))
goto rx_error;
@@ -223,8 +223,10 @@ static int cisco_rx(struct sk_buff *skb)
case CISCO_KEEPALIVE_REQ:
spin_lock(&st->lock);
st->rxseq = ntohl(cisco_data->par1);
- if (st->request_sent &&
- ntohl(cisco_data->par2) == st->txseq) {
+ ack = ntohl(cisco_data->par2);
+ if (ack && (ack == st->txseq ||
+ /* our current REQ may be in transit */
+ ack == st->txseq - 1)) {
st->last_poll = jiffies;
if (!st->up) {
u32 sec, min, hrs, days;
@@ -275,7 +277,6 @@ static void cisco_timer(unsigned long arg)
cisco_keepalive_send(dev, CISCO_KEEPALIVE_REQ, htonl(++st->txseq),
htonl(st->rxseq));
- st->request_sent = 1;
spin_unlock(&st->lock);
st->timer.expires = jiffies + st->settings.interval * HZ;
@@ -293,9 +294,7 @@ static void cisco_start(struct net_device *dev)
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&st->lock, flags);
- st->up = 0;
- st->request_sent = 0;
- st->txseq = st->rxseq = 0;
+ st->up = st->txseq = st->rxseq = 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&st->lock, flags);
init_timer(&st->timer);
@@ -317,8 +316,7 @@ static void cisco_stop(struct net_device *dev)
spin_lock_irqsave(&st->lock, flags);
netif_dormant_on(dev);
- st->up = 0;
- st->request_sent = 0;
+ st->up = st->txseq = 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&st->lock, flags);
}
--
Krzysztof Halasa
next reply other threads:[~2009-10-09 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-09 16:16 Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2009-10-13 10:18 ` [PATCH] WAN: fix Cisco HDLC handshaking David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3iqeoh7at.fsf@intrepid.localdomain \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).